History
Of Mechanical Engineering
Chapter 1
L.E.
Reber
1886
- 1907
By the early 1880s, engineering education had been firmly established across
America: more than seventy colleges and universities maintained full-time engineering
departments. University administrators recognized the key role of engineering
in the development of the nation and, thanks to the earlier passage of the Morrill
Land Grant Act, had the means to respond to the need for formal programs in
engineering education. In Pennsylvania, Lehigh University-a relatively new school-was
offering baccalaureate programs in civil, mechanical and mining and metallurgical
engineering. The Western University of Pennsylvania (later to become the University
of Pittsburgh) had recently implemented a four-year curriculum in civil engineering.
At the Pennsylvania State College, engineering education got off to a slow start. The institution was founded as the Farmers' High School in 1859 for the purpose of providing a system of instruction that encompassed all scientific aspects, both theoretical and practical, of the study of agriculture The school's first president, Evan Pugh, a thirty-one-year-old native of Chester County, appreciated the greater role the industrial arts (as general technical education was then known) would play in preparing students for their roles in the continuing industrialization of the nation.
On
July 2, 1862, President Lincoln signed the Congressional Land Grant Act,
known as the Morrill Act, through which a fund was created by each state
for the endowment of "at least one college where the leading object shall be, without
excluding other scientific and classical studies, and including military tactics,
to teach such branches of learning as are related to agriculture and the mechanic
arts...." In Massachusetts, M.I.T. received one third of the state's land-grant
funds, thereby making it "a" but not "the" land-grant institution. In March
1864, the Pennsylvania legislature voted to designate the Farmers' High School
as the state's only land-grant school. The vote was close. Unfortunately, Pugh's
death in 1864 led to a period of administrative instability. Between 1864 and
1879, six individuals served as President, each with his own interpretation
of the requirement for instruction in the "mechanic arts" as mandated by the
land-grant act. This situation combined with the faculty's preference for a
more traditional curriculum emphasizing the Greek and Latin languages, philosophy
and similar subjects, prevented development of an engineering program.
By this time, public support for Penn State had dwindled. In 1875, four students
received degrees: two years later only three degrees were awarded A joint trustee-faculty
committee, concerned about decreasing student enrollment and lack of public
support, convened to reorganize the college's curriculum. In April 1881 the
committee recommended curricular reforms including the formation of a baccalaureate
program in civil engineering and a two-year course in the mechanic arts (primarily
mechanical drawing and shop skills). At the June 1881 meeting, the Board of
Trustees accepted the committee's recommendation's and directed that they be
implemented.
With curricular reform underway, the Board of Trustees turned its attention
to the central problem facing the school-lack of sufficient state support. Although
the school had been designated as the sole recipient of revenues from the sale
of public lands under the Morrill Land Grant Act, it received no other real
support from the legislature. While the institution was Pennsylvania's only
land-grant school it was certainly not the state's school as were its counterparts
in Illinois, Wisconsin, Minnesota, etc. The Board of Trustees requested that
the school's affairs be investigated by the legislature. The trustees hoped
that an investigation would give formal attention to curricular changes, thereby
strengthening the school's credibility and enabling it to attract more students.
The trustees were not disappointed. In fact, the investigation went so far as
to recognize that the relationship of the state and its sole land-grant college
had at times bordered on detrimental. It further noted that the 30,000 annual
income provided under the land-grant act was wholly inadequate and recommended
that the legislature make regular appropriations to the school. The recommendation
was accepted by the legislature.
Penn State now offered a respectable curriculum for a land-grant institution and received financial and political support from the state. It still needed an individual who could lead the college into an era of growth. In the summer of 1882, just such a man was elected by the Board of Trustees as the President of the Pennsylvania State College: George Washington Atherton.
From
its inclusion in the Morrill Act in 1862, there was confusion between mechanic
arts and mechanical engineering. Mechanical Engineering was a defined field
of study, mechanic arts was not. Baccalaureate programs of mechanical engineering
existed in many United States and European institutions. The American Society
of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) was founded in 1880; the Institution of Mechanical
Engineering was founded in England several years earlier. To many educators,
mechanic arts was mechanical engineering, while to others, mechanic arts
was an extension of the shop culture for the training of craftsmen. Upon
taking office, Atherton expanded the mechanic arts program to three years
and instituted plans to convert it to a baccalaureate degree in mechanical
engineering. M.I.T. discontinued its mechanic arts program in 1889. In Atherton's
address dedicating the new mechanic arts building on February 10, 1886, he
said that the new program should "fix the student's attention upon those principles and processes which are of universal application," but it should also give some "attention to commercial work." Atherton's
address showed that he was sensitive to the European experience, where polytechnic
schools devoted exclusively to theoretical instruction in the highest branches
of engineering and applied science produced an oversupply of graduates. Atherton
believed that an oversupply of highly trained specialists was being repeated
in the United States but that the demand for graduates receiving instruction
combining theory and practice would be unlimited.
A baccalaureate degree in civil engineering had been in existence since 1880. Atherton wished to convert the mechanic arts program into a baccalaureate program in mechanical engineering. Recognizing the need to obtain qualified faculty yet limited by fiscal constraints, Atherton formulated a plan. The plan's success would not depend on acceptance and support of the trustees, but on one of the youngest members of the faculty-a 23-year-old instructor named Louis Ehrheart Reber.
Reber, who came from the community of Nittany in Centre County, entered Penn State in the fall of 1876 with a deficiency in algebra. He overcame the deficiency and graduated class valedictorian in 1880. After graduation, Reber remained at Penn State, where he held several positions: instructor in military science and tactics, 1881-82; assistant in the preparatory department and instructor in mechanical drawing, 1882-83; professor of mechanical drawing and instructor in mechanic arts, 1883-84. By spring 1883, Reber was bored and dissatisfied with academic life and decided that it was time for a change. He sold most of his personal possessions and planned to leave Penn State for El Paso, Texas, and go into private business.
At this point, Atherton approached Reber with a proposition: Reber should forego Texas and private business and instead enroll as a graduate student in the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. There he was to study mechanical engineering, paying close attention to the methods and practices of engineering education. After completing his studies, Reber was to return to Penn State and restructure the mechanic arts program into a four-year baccalaureate curriculum in mechanical engineering. Reber accepted (even after learning that he would personally have to finance his M.I.T. studies), and mechanical engineering at Penn State was born.
Upon completing his graduate studies in spring 1884, Reber embarked on a summer tour, visiting colleges and observing their mechanical engineering programs. His trip included the Worchester Polytechnic Institute (Massachusetts), Stevens Institute of Technology (New Jersey), Washington University (Missouri), and the University of Minnesota. Reber had the opportunity to observe firsthand a variety of successful programs. With his master's degree and the experience derived from these travels, Reber was ready to begin work.
Reber assessed the task that lay ahead. The existing mechanic arts program consisted of instruction in mechanical drawing, carpentry, and woodworking. Drawing was taught in the Main Building, and carpentry and woodworking classes were held in the converted attic of the school's pump house on the west corner of College Avenue and Allen Street (which ran through the campus at that time). Reber had a makeshift forge and a foundry installed in the pump house; however, he realized that more room would be needed. His request for funds to construct a new mechanic arts building was granted by President Atherton in 1885. By 1886, the new Mechanic Arts Building-a 34 foot by 50 foot, two-story, wood-frame structure- was constructed next to the pump house and stood on the site of what is today the east end of Hammond Building. This was the first classroom building to be constructed on the campus since the Main Building opened its doors in 1859.
On February 10, 1886, the building for what was to become Mechanical Engineering
was dedicated. Since no income of the college could be used to construct or
repair buildings, funds generated by the Department of Chemistry from the analysis
of fertilizers and other work were used for the new building. The building cost
$1,650 to construct. Equipment cost $1,800, not including $900 worth of equipment
donated by B. F. Sturtevant, Brookline, Mass., obtained by L. Reber. Also constructed
was a $400 cistern for the college's steam boiler constructed by the school's
farm personnel.
With
the new facility in place, Reber concentrated on obtaining instructional
equipment to furnish it. Funding was a problem; however, the always-inventive
Reber met the challenge. By pointing out to manufacturers the advertising
value of supplying equipment at reduced cost, Reber obtained a variety of
machinery and equipment, including a 16-inch turret lathe from Pratt and
Whitney of Hartford, a 36-inch drill press and a large planer from William
Sellers and Company of Philadelphia, and a shaper from Browne and Sharp of
Providence. Within a short time, Reber had furnished the entire building,
which now included a carpentry shop, a wood-turning room, a forge room, and
a machine shop. The total cost of the equipment was $2,000. Reber later would
write that although the shops in the building at that time were small, they
were "as
well equipped as any I had ever visited."
The Board of Trustees approved a mechanical engineering baccalaureate curriculum for the school year 1886-87 (see page 6). Three rooms were provided in the Main Building (now called Old Main)-two in the basement, outfitted as laboratories, and a lecture room on the first floor. The mechanical engineering curriculum was oriented toward students who were interested in the theoretical aspects of mechanisms and power systems.
As the head of the department, Reber's responsibilities were not limited to academic matters. He was also responsible for the operation of the college's steam-driven water pumps in the pump house on College Avenue and the steam heating plant in the basement of the Main Building. In 1887, Reber and his students received the additional responsibility of supervising the operation of the 50-horsepower steam engine and generator that supplied electrical power for the newly installed incandescent lighting system in the Main Building. These operational responsibilities, though sometimes burdensome, provided the mechanical engineering students with an excellent opportunity to gain practical experience.
The mechanical engineering program at Penn State had taken root and was beginning to grow. In the academic year 1887-88, eighteen of the ninety-two degree students at Penn State were enrolled in mechanical engineering. In 1889, the Pennsylvania State College graduated its first three mechanical engineers: H. E. Miles, Jacob Struble, and John Price Jackson. In 1890, eight students received their degrees in mechanical engineering, all of whom had received job offers or secured professional positions prior to commencement.
| ORIGINAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CURRICULUM -
1886 |
| The
object of this course is prepare students in those subjects which
will enable them to design machines or plants of machinery upon scientific
principles. The instruction is given by means of lectures and recitations,
with practice in the shops and laboratories. It treats of the mechanical
properties of materials, of the motions and efficiency of machines,
of the production, measurement, and distribution of power. Excursions
are occasionally made in order that students may witness running
machinery, methods of carrying power, arrangement of shafting, and
manufacturing processes. The study of steam engineering involves
the principles and applications of Thermodynamics, the characteristics
and use of different fuels, the generation of steam with the construction
of generators, and the mechanism and efficiency of the various steam
engines. Students are also required to design different forms of
valve gearing from data given them. Instruction is given on hydraulic
motors, windmills, pumps, air engines, and other machines. Drawing
is carried on in connection with recitations. It includes sketching
machines and drawing to scale from those sketches, making detail
and sectional drawings, and designing machines, thus applying the
principles and knowledge acquired in the classroom. The entire work
is made as practical as is consistent with a thorough theoretical
training. A course in shop work is required, besides the experimental
work with boilers, indicators, inspirators, governors, testing strength
of materials, etc. At the close of the course each student presents
a thesis, in which he is to give evidence of his efficiency by explaining
and illustrating some work of original research, or by designing
and describing with plates some piece of mechanism.
|
|
FALL SESSION: |
Algebra, Newcomb's College (1), Geometry, Wentworth's Plane
and Solid (2), German, Principia (5), History, Freeman's
General Sketch (4).
Practicum-Drawing, Geometrical and Projection
(4), Carpentry (4). |
WINTER SESSION: |
Trigonometry, Olney Plane and Spherical (2),
Geometry, Wentworth s Plane and Solid (4), Rhetoric, Welsh's (4),
German, Principia and Wilhelm Tell (5).
Practicum-Drawing, Intersections, (2), Carpentry
(6). |
SPRING SESSION: |
Trigonometry, Olney's Plane and Spherical (5), Physiology, Martin's
Human Body, Briefer Course (3), German, Rosenstengel's
Literature (5), Tactics (2).
Practicum-Drawing, Intersections and Developments
(4), Wood-turning (4) |
|
|
FALL SESSION: |
Analytical Geometry, Bowser s (4), Chemistry,
Stoddard s Lecture Notes on the Non-Metals (4), German,
Rosenstengel's Literature (2), French, Principia
(3), History, Freeman's General Sketch (2), Surveying,
Bellows and Hodgman (l).
Practicum-Surveying
(4), Chemistry (4). |
WINTER SESSION: |
Analytical Geometry, Bowser's (4), Chemistry, Stoddard's
Qualitative Analysis (4), German, Hodge's Scientific
(2), French, Principia (3), History, Freeman's General
Sketch (2).
Practicum-Chemistry (8), Pattern-making
(2). |
SPRING SESSION: |
Chemistry, same as winter session, (3), French, Racine's
Athalie and Saintsbury's French Literature (3), Differential
Calculus, Bowser's (4), Descriptive Geometry, Warrens
(4), Elements of Mechanism, Goodeve's (2).
Practicum-Chemistry (6), Drawing, Descriptive Geometry
(4). |
|
|
FALL SESSION: |
Physics, Mechanics and Heat, Daniell's
(4), Descriptive Geometry, Maps, Shades, Shadows, etc., Warren
s (4), Integral Calculus, Bowser's (3), Mechanical
Movements, MacCord's (4).
Practicum-Mechanics
(4), Mechanical Drawing (4). |
WINTER SESSION: |
Analytical and Graphical Statistics, Church's
(4), Physics, Daniell's (4), Materials of Engineering,
Thurston (3), Differential Equations, Forsythe and
Osborne's (2), Valve Gearing, Zeuner's (2).
Practicum-Physics
(4), Forging (6). |
SRING SESSION: |
Kinetics and Kinematics, Church's (4), Thermodynamics,
Clausin's (4), Materials of Engineering, Thurston
(3), Physics (4).
Practicum-Chipping and Filing (6),
Mineralogy (4). |
|
|
FALL SESSION: |
Determinants, Hanus' (3), Mechanics
of Machinery (4), Geology, Dana's (4). Political Economy,
Bowen s (4).
Practicum-Mechanical Drawing (6),
Engine Lathe Work (6). |
WINTER SESSION: |
Quaternions, Hardy's (3), Steam and Steam
Engine, Weisback and Rankine (4), Experimental work with
Indicators, Injectors, and Governors (2), Constitutional Law, Cooley's
(4), Astronomy, Newcomb and Holden's (3).
Practicum-Mechanical
Drawing (4), Machine Construction and Testing Strength of Materials
(6). |
SPRING SESSION: |
Machine Design, Unwin's (5), Quaternions,
Hardy s (3), Hydraulic Motors (Lectures) (3), International
Law, Woolsey's (4).
Practicum-Machine Construction
(4), Thesis Work (6). |
|
The photo to the left shows a steam engine built by the mechanical engineering students, classes of 1890 and 1891. The engine was used for instructional purposes in courses on thermodynamics and power machinery for several decades. It is highly probable that the students prepared the drawings, cast the metal, machined the castings, and tested the engine as class assignments during the period 1886-91.
With more and more students arriving each year to study engineering, the lack
of adequate classroom space again became a problem. President Atherton appealed
to the legislature for funds to construct a new engineering building. To support
this appeal, Atherton enlisted Reber's aid. Reber developed a card file for
Atherton that contained the names of the state senators and representatives
and relevant personal data. He asked alumni to provide their respective legislators
with a college catalog, comment on the high quality of the school, and endorse
the need for increased financial support. An invitation to visit the college
was then sent. Reber personally escorted the visitors around the college during
their stay.
Atherton
and Reber's efforts resulted in a state allocation of $100,000 in 1891 to
construct a building for the Departments of Civil and Mechanical Engineering.
On February 22,1893, the new facility — a three-story, red-brick structure
designed by the well known architect of college buildings, Fred L. Olds — was
christened the Main Engineering Building (see photo page 8). This structure
was the most expensive, aside from Old Main, yet constructed on campus.
Its dedication on a cold, snowy day attracted almost 300 guests, among
them Governor Robert E. Pattison and U.S. Secretary of the Interior John
W. Noble.
Mechanical Engineering Building,
circa 1900.
In the rear of the Main Engineering Building and located along College Avenue
was the college's steam power plant, and nearby was the pump station for the
college's water supply. Coal was transported to the power plant by a railroad
line from the west over land that would eventually become the site of the Hammond
Building and the south wing of the Mechanical Engineering Building. The steam
power plant was used in laboratory instruction. A boiler test in which coal
consumption, steam flow rate, temperature, and pressures were measured over
a twenty-four-hour period provided a unique experience for mechanical engineering
students for decades. The practice ended during the 1950s.
To furnish the new building, Reber persuaded Atherton to allocate $10,000.
One of the first items purchased was a Reynolds-Corliss triple expansion steam
engine from the Allis-Chalmers Company. Allis-Chalmers not only modified the
engine to suit Reber's specifications to make it useful for construction, but
in the end sold it for considerably less than market value. Reber also purchased
an 1890 Stirling cycle engine from the Rider Ericson Company of Philadelphia.
This rare engine was eventually donated to the Smithsonian Institution in 1963.
Additional equipment came from the Westinghouse Air Brake Company, the Detroit
Lubricator Company, the American Steel Packing Company, and the Pennsylvania
Railroad.
By the fall of 1893, the number of students enrolled in mechanical engineering
courses had increased to a total of 44 out of a college-wide enrollment of 181.
Reber himself taught most subjects; Lieutenants John Pemberton and Thomas W.
Kinkaid (both on loan from the Department of the Navy) were responsible for
teaching machine design and mechanical drawing. Assistant Professor William
M. Toule supervised the mechanics shops where students learned carpentry, foundry
and forge work, and tool and pattern making (see photo below).
In 1894, Penn State's first summer session featured a two-week course required of all freshman, sophomore, and junior engineering students. These two weeks gave students field experience including visits to coal mines, railroad shops, foundries, power stations, and other installations the students had studied previously in the classroom. Such field trips continued until the late 1960s.
In 1895, President Atherton reorganized
Penn State into seven schools: Agriculture; Natural Science; Mathematics
and Physics; Engineering; Mines; Language and Literature; History,
Political Science, and Philosophy. Atherton appointed a dean of each
school. The engineering dean's responsibilities included scheduling
instructors and classes, administering discipline, and coordinating
the activities of the Departments of Civil, Electrical, Mining, and
Mechanical Engineering. Atherton selected L. E. Reber to be the first
dean of the School of Engineering. This appointment was made in recognition
of Reber's years of service and contribution and was to be held concurrently
with his position as head of the Department of Mechanical Engineering.
These administrative duties left him with little time for teaching. "Ike" Reber,
as he was known by his students, was a popular and effective instructor;
and though his students were happy with his appointment as dean, they would
miss him in the classroom.
Mechanical Engineering students
in front of the Mechanic Arts Building, circa 1890.
By 1900, many of Penn State's mechanical engineering graduates were making their
mark on society. Jacob Struble ('89) and James C. Mock ('90) were leaders in
the perfection of automatic block signals, a major advance in railway traffic
control and safety. Phillip G. Gossler, ('90) would become president of Columbia
Gas Company, and Arthur G. McKee ('91) head of his own international consulting
and contracting firm, which would do hundreds of millions of dollars of business
throughout the world. The photo above and the photos below show a number of
mechanical engineering student activities that took place in the Main Engineering
Building during these years.
Mechanical Engineering students
in a foundry class in 1903. C.L. Kinsloe, who later became head of Electrical
Engineering, is second from right in the first row.
The first five years of the School of Engineering were both satisfying and frustrating
for Dean Reber. Engineering education had become quite popular and total student
enrollment had increased to 237. However, the severe fiscal constraints experienced
by the college prevented the expansion of teaching facilities. By 1908, Penn
State had one of the ten largest engineering programs in the nation and remained
the largest engineering school in the Commonwealth. Although the five members
of the mechanical engineering faculty were forced to use old and worn laboratory
equipment and sometimes had to teach two different classes simultaneously, the
department continued to grow.
Instructional activities
in Main Engineering Building from a college report of 1894 weighing coal for
twenty-four-hour boiler tests; Orsat analysis; machine tool laboratory.

Dean Reber turned to the railroads to support the needs
of his increasing numbers of students. Recognizing that innovations
in locomotive size, power, and maintenance would provide an expanding
job market for mechanical engineering graduates, Reber wanted to involve
the railroad construction and maintenance complex located in Altoona,
Pennsylvania. He created a practicum on steam locomotives for mechanical
engineering students. The Bellefonte Central Railroad provided a small
2-8-0 type locomotive (known as Bellefonte Central Locomotive No. 4)
and access to the entire length of the line between Bellefonte and
State College. The practicum — usually taken by seniors — provided
students with the opportunity to gather material for their (required)
theses. Reber recognized the potential of such a program and, along
with Assistant Professor of Experimental Engineering Arthur J. Wood,
began negotiations for a locomotive and related gear with the Pennsylvania
Railroad. A. J. Wood was born in Roseville, New Jersey, in 1874. His
father was a professor of mechanical engineering at Stevens. Wood had
graduated valedictorian from Stevens Institute in 1896 and had joined
the faculty at Penn State in 1904.

Instructional activities
in Main Engineering Building (from top): metal casting laboratory; freshman
drafting class; students and faculty in doorway of the main Engineering Building.

In 1906, the college received an eight-wheel, passenger-type steam locomotive
(No. 01001, a Class D8b 4-4-0) on loan from the Pennsylvania Railroad (see charts
below). To supplement this acquisition, Wood's students constructed a dynamometer
car to perform various performance tests. The locomotive was steamed up to run
the eighteen miles to Bellefonte. Experiments were made only on the return run
since there was a prevailing grade from Bellefonte to Penn State. A train of
loaded freight cars was coupled to the locomotive by a dynamometer constructed
by Wood and his students. A calibrated spring was mounted on a frame so that
deflections could be transmitted to a pencil that drew a continuous record on
paper that moved at a speed proportional to the train speed. Three men rode
on the locomotive, two on either side to take indicator cards (pressure-volume
diagrams) from the drive cylinders and one to count the revolutions of the drivers.
Another man read draft gauges on either side of the diaphragm of the smoke box
and took readings from a calorimeter on the steam dome to determine the steam
quality. Two men managed the dynamometer and read a tachometer for the RPM of
the drivers. The amount of water entering the boiler was measured, as was the
amount of coal used. The tractive horsepower was determined from the draw-bar
force and the train speed; the indicated horsepower was obtained from the indicator
cards. The ratio of the two gave the mechanical efficiency and the ratio of
tractive power to input thermal energy gave the overall thermal efficiency.
Students continued to arrive at Penn State to study engineering in ever-increasing
numbers, and by 1906, seventy-four members of the graduating class of ninety-three
were engineers. In the junior class, the percentage of engineering students
was just as great. Students no longer came mostly from the Centre County region
as in the past, but from throughout the state. Penn State was competing quite
successfully with the University of Pennsylvania, Lehigh University, and the
Western University of Pennsylvania, and with other land-grant institutions as
well (see charts below), partly because the college charged only for room, board,
and laboratory fees. State residents paid no tuition. Competition for admission
was stiff, and for acceptance in engineering, a student had to demonstrate proficiency
in algebra, plane and solid geometry, and physics, in addition to language and
literature.
The reputation Penn State graduates were earning in the professional world also contributed to the college's ability to attract engineering students. Engineering alumni worked for a variety of companies, including General Electric, Westinghouse, Union Switch and Signal, and the Pennsylvania Railroad. Mechanical engineering graduates of this period would have similar success in the business world and in academics. Charles E. Denney ('00) would become president of the Northern Pacific Railroad in 1929. Earl B. Norris ('04) would serve as dean of engineering at the University of Montana and then at the Virginia Polytechnic Institute.
To
meet the needs of a growing and now well-respected engineering department,
Dean Reber prepared a plan for reorganizing the curricula. His plan included
doubling the size of the Main Engineering Building. Unfortunately, in the
summer of 1906, President George W. Atherton, died. Under Atherton, Penn
State had become a respected institution of higher learning. One year after
Atherton's death, L. E. Reber — gifted, popular teacher and excellent curricular
planner and administrator — left the college to become dean of Extension
at the University of Wisconsin. Reber single-handedly developed mechanical
engineering education at Penn State. His contributions to engineering education
in general were greater than any other individual's efforts of that era.
|
|
|
|