
|
Introduction/Problem Statement
|
Airplanes accumulate moisture on their exteriors while in flight and while grounded. In the colder weather, this moisture freezes into ice, and this ice can seriously hinder an aircraft’s performance. Therefore, it is necessary to deice them on a regular basis. Many airports have methods they employ for the deicing of their planes. The University Park Airport has employed the same deicing method for many years, and this method no longer offers as many benefits as it does problems.
The current deicing method involves the use of a deicing truck equipped with a hose that sprays the deicing formula onto airplanes as they are docked at the aircraft-deicing pad. The deicing formula (propylene glycol) is then allowed to gravity drain into two 10,000-gallon storage tanks. A system of trench drains and valves provides a means to separate the deicing fluids from the storm water drainage system.
Unfortunately, as the airplanes are being deiced, some of the deicing
fluid remains on the deicing apron and evaporates into the atmosphere.
Some of the deicing fluid escapes the drainage system and ends up in the
storage drain. In other instances, the deicing fluid flows onto the
adjacent macadam on the eastern end of the deicing pad or into the grass
surrounding the deicing pad. These miscues may contribute to environmental
pollution and must be corrected. The University Park Airport also
would like to increase the efficiency of the deicing process itself, perhaps
even automating it. The current method requires individuals to perform
all deicing operations manually, and this method lacks the speed and precision
of the automated and/or stage-by-stage deicing processes applied by other
airports.
|
Objectives
|
|
1. To provide an engineering design, which
automates the manual deicing process, that will be “stand alone”.
|
|
2. To present detailed drawings of the engineering
design.
|
|
3. To meet all of the environmental, economical,
and design requirements of the deicing process.
|
|
4. To present all work, findings, and the
final solution to the University Park airport within the preset timescale.
|
|
Team Members
|
Job Descriptions
|
|
Ausmus Marburger
|
Project Manager
Project Engineer |
|
Robert Gould
|
CAD Operator
Project Engineer |
|
Matt Boeckel
|
Design Research
Intergroup Liaison
Project Engineer |
|
Steve Stadnicki
|
Group Secretary
Project Engineer |
|
Livia Ball
|
CAD Operator
Project Engineer |
| Proposed Solutions |
Expanding Deicing Apron and Adding more Drainage Grooves
By extending the apron, the deicing fluid that normally lands in the
grass area surrounding the apron will now land in the extended apron and
will ultimately make its way into the storage tanks for disposal instead
of contaminating Spring Creek. Furthermore, more grooves will be
etched into the surface of the apron in order to direct deicing fluid on
the apron to the drains and into the tank so that it also does not run
off into the lawn.
This design is simple and requires little technical maintenance once completed. It also will cost relatively less than other solutions proposed in this proposal. This solution is not 100% effective, however. The client should still expect some loss of deicing fluid to the lawn area. Also, the object-free zone surrounding the runway will also need to be considered in this design.
Redistributing Storm Water Drains
Currently the storm water drains on the lawn area surrounding the deicing
apron are equipped only to carry and dispose of clean rain water.
Under the new design the drains will be equipped to handle both the storm
water and deicing fluid. This will be accomplished by redesigning
the drains in a similar fashion to the way the drain on the apron has been
designed.
This design will interfere less with the airport's current operations, as all changes will be below the surface. It will also save much of the fluid from draining into Spring Creek, which has potential hazards to the environment. This design might not be compatible with some future expansion plans, however.
Automation/Heating Coils
All possible solutions will be fully automated including the valves
operating the drains and the heating coils. The heating coils will
be turned on with automatically when a snow sensor detects snow on the
drains. This will keep the drains free of ice and snow as to allow
the unrestricted flow of fluids.
| Project Information |
| Sponsor Company: | University Park Airport |
| Contact: | Brian Rogers |
| Contracting Engineer: | L.R. Kimball & Associates |
| Contact: | Richard Holes |
| Faculty Coach: | Damian Rose |
| Date: | Fall 2001 |
| Additional Information |