Design of an Exhaust Gas Heat Recovery System to Heat Domestic Water for Use at the Muncy Kellogg Facility |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
Team D, Kellogg Heat Recovery |
![]() |
![]() |
| Executive Summary | Objectives | Design Specifications | Cost & Savings | Conclusions | Contacts |
![]() |
![]() |
| Three oven lines in Kellogg Company's Muncy plant. Left to right are lines 1, 2, and 3. |
Cross flow Continuous Fin Heat Exchanger Cutaway view |
The Kellogg's company has requested that a team of Penn State engineers design a heat recovery system to recover waste heat from the exhaust of natural gas fired ovens to heat domestic process water. The company would like to see a temperature increase from 40 °F to 140 °F in the water.
The sponsor has not been able to provide the Penn State team with the daily usage of hot water at the facility, which is necessary to design and size the specific system. In the absence of this critical data, the team has performed a parametric analysis of a cross flow continuous fin heat exchanger to demonstrate relationships between exchanger characteristics (both geometrical and fluid) and the amount of thermal energy that can be recovered. To do this efficiently, the team developed a custom computer code to perform multiple heat transfer calculations rapidly and obtain trends.
The team used the custom computer code to determine the best dimensions of the heat exchanger and storage tank. A 220 gallon tank was found to be optimal. It was determined that it is possible to extract 50 kW from the exhaust stack (out of 246 kW available), producing a maximum heat exchanger outlet temperature of 209 °F and a storage tank steady state temperature of 135 °F, when the optimal 220 gallon storage tank is used.
The system will reduce the plant's use of natural gas fired boilers to heat domestic process water. Based on the amount of energy saved and current natural gas prices, the team expects to see an operational cost savings up to $17,000 per year. The initial investment cost in system hardware is estimated to be approximately $8300. The payback period on the investment is then just under 6 months.
**Note: The heat recovery system specified here may not be the optimum choice for the Kellogg's plant due to insufficient data. The results here are parametric and provide a basis for future designs should proper data become available.
In the design of the heat recovery system, many different parameters need to be considered. Due to the large number of variables and the complexities of the system, the team decided that a parametric analysis was the best approach. A custom computer code was designed to perform a parametric analysis of a cross flow continuous fin heat exchanger. The code simulates the heat recovery system, taking into account the properties of the two working fluids, city water and exhaust gases, the flow rates of the working fluids, the dimensions of the heat exchanger and storage tank, and the water demand. The code outputs the temperature of the storage tank versus time, the temperatures of the gas and water at the outlets of the heat exchanger. It also calculates the inner, outer, and overall heat transfer coefficients for the heat exchanger.
From the outputs of the computer code, components for the system were selected. Following are descriptions of each of the components. The water storage tank, piping, and pumps are standard items available from many supplies, including McMaster-Carr. The heat exchanger is custom designed, making it necessary to outsource it to a manufacturer that specialized in custom heat exchangers. Included below are basic specifications for the control system. Since the control system is mainly an electrical system, the final design of it will be outsourced to a company specializing in these types of systems.
Heat Exchanger
|
Water Storage Tank
|
Control System
|
Piping
|
Pumps
|
Cost & SavingsIn an effort to provide a quantitative value to the money that can be saved using a heat recovery process, a cost analysis was performed. This is the best estimate the group can provide at this time. When the data on daily hot water usage becomes available, it will be possible to make a more refined estimate. The Kellogg's facility currently uses natural gas fired boilers to heat water. The heat recovery system will reduce the use of these boilers, there by reducing the plant's demand for natural gas. The team has calculated that approximately 50 kW can be recovered by this design. With current natural gas prices, this would result in an average savings of $17,000 per year in natural gas. Shown to the right is a cost breakdown of the system hardware. With an initial investment of approximately $8300 in the system hardware, the payback period is just under 6 months. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faculty Coach | Sponsor Liaison | |
| Savas Yavuzkurt | John G. Legarski II | |
| Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering Department | Kellogg, Muncy, PA Facility | |
| The Pennsylvania State University | 572 Industrial Park Road | |
| 201B Reber Building | Muncy, PA 17756 | |
| University Park, PA 16802 | Ph: (570) 546-7383 E282 | |
| Fax: (570) 546-7096 | ||
| Email: john.legarski@kellogg.com | ||
| URL: www.kelloggcompany.com | ||
Team Members | ||
| Position | Name | |
| Leader | Ben Bachman | btb137@psu.edu |
| Recorder | Jim Schmalzried | jcs314@psu.edu |
| Reporter | Benjamin Heyser | blh187@psu.edu |
| Time Keeper | Jon Gordon | jag399@psu.edu |
| Devil's Advocate | Nate Wiehe | new129@psu.edu |