 |
Penn State University's 2004
BUV Team Members:
| Mike Minnich |
Mike Lesko |
Matt Shirk |
| Brandon Kline |
Andrew Settlemyer |
Mark Magnotta |
| Randy Mehalko |
Brandon Fritz |
Erica Sturgeon
|
The Institute for Affordable Transportation (IAT) is an organization
devoted to providing cheap, reliable and user-friendly transportation
to developing countries. To promote their goals the IAT sponsors a design
competition for a Basic Utility Vehicle (BUV). The BUV should be light,
durable, easy to fix, inexpensive, and simple to drive. Team BUV is the
first group at Penn State to tackle the design of a BUV. This year Team
BUV will develop a first prototype but will not compete in the IAT sponsored
competition. In the future Penn State hopes to have a team competing in
the BUV competition.
Many non-industrialized nations are in search of a method for affordable
and reliable transportation for their everyday workplace use. The IAT
has sponsored a project to develop a BUV to have designers try to meet
the needs of these countries. Since these countries typically do not have
the resources to develop and assemble these types of vehicles from raw
materials, the IAT has turned this project into a competition for people
of all ages, particularly college students. From the limitations that
are imposed on the project, the IAT can control the designs and help to
keep them affordable, their main goal.
As a new segment of Penn State's involvement in design competitions,
Team BUV will create the first prototype of the BUV that will be used
for future reference. Subsequent design groups will use this model to
initiate their design and eventually become a part of the IAT's BUV Design
Competition. Through the guidance of Dr. John Lamancusa, the group will
design an optimized utility vehicle and then, after approval, begin fabrication
of a functional prototype.
| Specifications |
- Cost: $1600
- Payload: 450 kg or 1000 lbs (including driver)
- Cargo Deck Space > 16 square feet
- Passenger Mode (optional) Seating for at least
5 people (including driver)
- Top Speed: 32 km/h or 20 mph on grass (governed)
- Mass / Weight: < 225 kg or 500 lbs
- Ground Clearance: > 20 cm or 7.9" (except
for differential or sprocket which is > 5")
- Turning Diameter: < 6 m or 19.8 feet
- Range: 160 km or 100 miles (can use secured secondary
tank)
- Width: < 1.34 m (allows assembled unit to
fit in small pick-up bed)
- Engine 8 hp - 12 hp Internal combustion engine
(emissions specifications TBD)
|
- Driveline: Two wheel drive (locked, or lockable),
reverse not required
- Materials: UV resistant, water resistant, corrosion
resistant
- Angle of Approach: > 45 degrees
- Angle of Departure: > 35 degrees
- Tip Angle > 45 degrees
- Ramp Break-over Angle > 25 degrees
- Seat Height Sitting surface < 36" from
ground for driver and passengers
- Weight Distribution 65% / 35% (or more uneven)
when unloaded. This facilitates changing direction in minimal
space by lifting & moving the light end.
- Safety Equipment: Seat belts, parking brake,
bumper, horn, brake light, front light, rear light kill switch,
eight light reflectors (2 per side), passenger handles/ropes,
tie-downs, or boat cleats (for securing cargo), "anti-roll"
protection (roll-bar stops vehicle rotation at ¼ roll
|
| Our Approach |
|



|
The chassis and drive-train design of the basic utility vehicle
can have 3 major variations. The location of the drive wheels, the
location of the steering wheels, and the type of suspension used
at each axle are all variables. We have furnished three different
platforms, varying the layout of the components mentioned. The drive
train of each has been decided. A 12 horsepower horizontal shaft
engine or similar equivalent will be coupled to a continuously variable
transmission (CVT) automatic type V belt transmission, similar to
those used in snowmobiles. This will provide a wide, infinitely
variable range of reductions, and must satisfy our overall reduction
of approximately 9:1 for a top speed of 20 miles per hour at 3100
RPM.
Because there are so many possible implementations, due to the
large scope of this project, we will first list the three different
drive and steering location schemes. The first type is a rear wheel
drive, front steer platform. This is the most popular choice among
current budget priced small utility vehicles. This allows the powered
axle to be separate from the steering wheels. The next design considered
is the front wheel drive, front steer platform. This complicates
things slightly by incorporating steering and power transmission
into one articulated package. The third alternative is a front drive,
rear steering design. These three designs only impose two radically
different situations. The front-wheel-drive, rear steer and rear-wheel-drive,
front steer both isolate the powered axle from the steering wheels,
while the front-wheel-drive, front steer does not. This brings us
to consider the different suspension implementations used for the
two very different designs.
Due to simplicicity, rear wheel drive front steer was chosen for
the final design.
|
|
 |
A frame will fabricated from 2" x 3" tubing with 0.120"
wall thickness. The front end will consist of a twin A-arm setup with
coil over strut suspension. The drive train will consist of a 10 Hp Briggs
& Stratton engine donated by Briggs & Stratton, Inc. The engine
will be coupled to a Polaris Variable Transmission which features forward,
neutral, and reverse gearing positions. This transmission will turn a
differentiated rear axle from a 1986 Suzuki Samuri by way of pulleys and
a belt. Coil over struts will be the suspension choice to connect the
frame to the rear axle. The ergonomics team is assembling seats, pedals,
a steering wheel, and a bed necessary for the complete operation of the
vehicle.
Links to specific component specifications are provided at the bottom
of this page.
| Performance Features |
" Capable of climbing 10% slope (fully loaded)
" Fording Ability: 18 inches of water
" Brake(s) will lock at least two wheels during the stop (off-pavement,
fully loaded)
" Capable of towing a 200 kg (440 lb) trailer load with 50 lb
tongue weight
" Ease of Maintenance: "shade-tree" mechanic can stand
vehicle on its side or end to access undercarriage.
|
|