"We always strive to shatter the mold!"
Best viewed in 800 x 600 resolution
Executive Summary | Problem Statement |
Possible Solutions
Decision Matrix |
Final Solution |
Experimental Data | Safety Concerns
About the Sponsor | About
the Team
![]()
Shattered
Ideas has proposed the creation of a
safe mechanism for effectively crushing light bulbs.
The team was formed as a result of Skills of Central Pennsylvania
collaborating with Pennsylvania State University’s College of Engineering
to create a project for a senior design course.
The members of Shattered Ideas have created an easy-to-operate
machine that effectively crushes light bulbs.
The
cost of waste removal has been more than Skills
anticipated, and they would like to reduce that cost by reducing the amount
of waste they produce. Crushing
defective light bulbs will greatly reduce the amount of volume they occupy in a
dumpster, subsequently lowering the cost of waste removal.
The team will also focus on controlling the “dust” created by
crushing bulbs, which is actually a fine powder and a necessary component in the
light bulbs. This is a major issue
because Skills of Central Pennsylvania has other products that must
remain dust free. Preliminary
research has indicated that this powder from the light bulbs can be hazardous,
so the containment of the dust is especially important.
One
of the services that Skills provides is light bulb inspection for Osram/Sylvania.
While inspecting light bulbs may be the primary objective of this
service, Skills stays true to their mission of providing support those who need
specialized services. This
inspection service provides a number of disabled people with jobs. To be successful, Skills must be conscious of both their
business and their community, so both must be considered in the evaluation of a
problem.
The
current process of discarding defective bulbs has produced more waste (in terms
of volume) than expected. Several
thousands of defective, intact bulbs are discarded each week, results in waste
removal costs of up to $1,800 a month. Creating
a simple machine to crush defective light bulbs, effectively reducing the volume
of waste, could lower costs and also produce a job for a disabled person.
The person operating the crushing machine would be performing a
significant task and ideally saving Skills money in the long run.
Closer inspection of the process revealed a problem other than the volume of waste. Employees complained about a fine dust that seemed to come from bulbs that were broken accidentally. This dust turns out to be an irritant, and it will certainly have to be dealt with, especially when it comes to crushing the bulbs. Accidental breakage occurred on the inspection line and during transport, in part because of flimsy or worn out cardboard boxes.
The
original problem combined with some preliminary research has led to a more appropriate problem statement with specific
objectives. This statement can be
divided into the following three parts:
·
First, the current process produces
an unnecessarily large volume of waste, so the solution should significantly
reduce that volume.
·
Second, the crushing process will
release a toxic powder from the light bulbs, so the solution will control this
powder and include necessary safety precautions.
·
Finally, Skills is dedicated to providing meaningful
jobs to people with disabilities, so the solution should call for some kind of
simple human operation.

The hydraulic crusher takes advantage of
hydraulics to effectively and easily crush the light bulbs. This design
can be either manual or automatic depending on the hydraulic that is attached to
the design.. The hydraulic
for the automatic crusher is motorized as opposed to the manual “jack like”
crusher for the manual. This
crusher will incorporate interchangeable plastic bins for easy transport from
line to crusher. The bin will have
the hydraulics move a plate to crush from the top. The top plate
will also be equipped with a dust collection system to control the dust from the
broken light bulbs.
Meshing
Gears

This design would use a gravity feed to drop bulbs from a bin into the gears, which by turning would crush the bulbs within them. The gears would be approximately 1.5 feet in length with a diameter of about 8 inches. The gears alone would be costly. This design also be unfeasible, as it would be hard to implement a gravity feed system that wouldn’t jam easily. It would be important for this design to have a powerful enough motor that light bulbs wouldn’t jam the gears.
Cement Mixer

This design takes the drum (which would be some form of new bins) and adds a shaft through the center of it. The shaft would have chains attached to it. When the drum was filled to a specific capacity it would be wheeled back to a motor, which would be mounted in the rear of the warehouse. The shaft would connect to the motor. When the motor was turned on it would spin the shaft, which would whip the chains around which then would crush the bulbs. Unfortunately this design wouldn’t crush the bulbs as finely as some of the other designs. If this design were overloaded it could also have problems if the chains were unable to get free of the light bulbs.
Lead Screw / Rack and Pinion
The lead screw and rack and pinion system would be very similar. They both would be similar to the hydraulic system except in that in the lead screw and rack and pinion the plate will be lowered to crush the bulbs. These systems run into problems as the bulbs start to compact. After a certain point it will take more torque from the motor to effectively crush the bulbs. Because of the problems experienced with the resistance from the crushing, these systems would experience force on the screw threads, which must be precise for this system to effectively work. The rack and pinion design needs to have their threads very precisely extruded in order for the system to be effective. These systems also cannot easily be manually operated due to the amount of force that would be necessary when resistance is encountered.
One of the key approaches to making the decision of which design was the best was to use a Decision Matrix. The criteria used for our decision matrix are cost, feasibility, capacity, reliability, portability, ease of use, and efficiency.
Cost - criterion
is fairly straight forward comparing the cost to create each device.
The design with the lowest cost will have the highest number for the cost
criteria.
Feasibility - a measurement of various factors.
These factors include calculations necessary to create the design,
ability to construct the design, and the time needed to make the design
successful.
Capacity - used to gauge how many bulbs each design could accommodate
at one time without being overloaded.
Reliability - measures the chances that a machine will break down in
service. One of the main
measurements of reliability will be based on moving parts.
The more moving parts a design has leads to an increased chance of being
unreliable.
Portability - a measurement of the design’s size and ease of moving.
It has been made clear that our design should be easily moved or
relocated.
Ease of Use - measures the relative difficulty to use the machine.
If the design functions by the push of a button it will get a higher ease
of use rating than a design which would require physical input.
Efficiency - a measurement of how well it can crush the light bulbs. If the machine can only break the light bulbs into large chunks it won’t do so well (low rating) on the efficiency scale. If the machine can grind the bulbs into finer pieces it will get a high rating.
|
|
|
Contributing
Factors in Decision Process |
|
||||||
|
|
|
Cost |
Reliability |
Portability |
Capacity |
Efficiency |
Feasibility |
Ease
of Use |
TOTAL |
|
|
Weight |
20 |
10 |
8 |
14 |
13 |
20 |
15 |
100 |
|
Options
Being Considered |
Hydraulics
(auto) |
3.5 |
8 |
5 |
10 |
8 |
4 |
10 |
664 |
|
Gears |
2 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
9 |
0 |
9 |
366 |
|
|
Cement
Mixer |
8 |
7 |
7 |
2 |
1 |
7 |
5 |
542 |
|
|
Rack
& Pinion |
7.5 |
3 |
5 |
7 |
6 |
4 |
10 |
626 |
|
|
Lead
Screw |
7 |
7 |
5 |
8 |
6 |
6 |
10 |
710 |
|
|
Hydraulics
(manual) |
7.5 |
8 |
10 |
9 |
5 |
9 |
6 |
771 |
|

Brace
Dimensions:
Crushing plate: 20 in. x 24 in.
x 0.1875 in.
Brace
height: 48 in.
Brace
base/top: 30 in. x 26 in. x 0.1875 in.
Crushing
plate support height: 12 in.
Crushing
plate support cross-section: 1 in. x 1 in. (see Appendix)
Brace Material: Medium grade, mild steel
Lifting Mechanism: 1500 pound motorcycle jack
|
|
Small Bulbs Run 1 |
Small Bulbs Run 2 |
Medium Bulbs Run 1 |
Medium Bulbs Run 2 |
Large Bulbs Run1 |
Large Bulbs Run 2 |
|
Initial Height (inches) |
0.5 |
-0.75 |
-0.25 |
-1 |
-0.75 |
-0.5 |
|
Final Height (inches) |
7 |
7.5 |
8.75 |
9 |
9 |
9.75 |
|
Total Height Difference (inches) |
6.5 |
8.25 |
9 |
10 |
9.75 |
10.25 |
|
Initial Volume (inches^3) |
3675 |
3307.5 |
3454.5 |
3822 |
3748.5 |
3675 |
|
Final Volume (inches^3) |
1470 |
1984.5 |
955.5 |
882 |
882 |
661.5 |
|
% Reduction |
60 |
60 |
72.3 |
76.9 |
76.5 |
82 |
Inhalation of dust
- Respiratory irritant
- Added vacuum system and plastic
curtains for dust control
Correct bin placement in crushing mechanism
- Additional braces added in order to
properly align the bin

Skills of Central Pennsylvania, Inc. is a private, non-profit, human service organization that is committed to creating opportunities and providing support for individuals who need specialized services to acquire the necessary skills and experiences to participate in all aspects of personal and community life with dignity and respect. (Click here for their Website)
Johana
Rico
Project Manager
-Record-keeping and collection of documents
-Keep team
focused
-Responsibilities are evenly distributed
Qualifications
-Past
experience in team environment with emphasis on management
Other Skills
-Six
Sigma
-Manufacturing experience
Steven
Scott
Communication
Officer
-Communication
between group and sponsor
Qualifications
-As a
production intern for The Washington Post, Steven gave presentations to
mailroom managers
Other Skills
-Machine
dynamics
-Engineering
mechanics
-Safety in
the work place
-Metal
fabrication
Justin Jonaitis
Engineer/Secretary
-Apply
creativity and experiences to project design
-Keep minutes
for the group meetings
Qualifications
-As a
co-op of Dana Corporation, Justin learned the intricacies of Excel, and
gained experience in
reviewing Technical drawings.
Other Skills
-Design
-Machine
dynamics
-Engineering
mechanics
-Pro-Engineering
Adam Rahmel
Engineer
-Apply
creativity and experiences to project design
Qualifications
-Worked
for Naperville's Engineering Department for two summers providing substantial
experience in construction
and construction supervision.
-Constructed
a model of the lower leg for the Penn State Biomechanics Lab
Other Skills
-Basic
Finance
-Business
Plan development
-Intellectual
Property
Brent
Herring
Engineer
-Apply
creativity and experiences to project design
Qualifications
-As a
co-op for Curtis Wright EMD in Pittsburgh, he created operational
guidlines for machining processes and
improved on the design for manufacturability manual with a multidisciplinary
team.
Other Skills
-technology-based
entrepeneurship
-leadership
in organizations