The project is a continuation from fall 2006 and is sponsored by Dr. Mathew and
the Hershey Medical Center. Endoscopic suturing devices allow surgeries to be
preformed inside the body without any external incisions. No incisions means
less recovery time for the patient and no scars. The suturing instrument is
designed to seal incisions made inside the body after an endoscopic surgery is
performed. The flexible instrument is designed to move a needle through human
tissue while
sewing up incisions inside the body. It needs to open and close, and also move
the needle from one side to another. Background research has proven that
endoscopic suturing is a very new concept and only few designs have been created
and tested. Our control device needs to be operable with one hand and
lightweight.
The
prototype was drawn up into two halves, one being the male side and the other
being the female side. We decided to use a peg system to interlock the two
halves, which allows us to take apart the prototype and change the internal
mechanisms as we continue to alter the device rather than permanently securing
the two sides together. The first mechanism, the toggle, will be attached to a
wire that opens and closes the sheath that houses the suturing device. It will
have a safety system that prevents the user from opening
the sheath too far and it will lock in place in the open and closed positions to
prevent the device from malfunctioning while entering or exiting a human body.
The next mechanism was designed using an endocopic surgery book offered to us by
Dr. Mathew. The text contained pictures of how the endoscope worked internally.
The actual endoscope uses a gear and chain mechanism for moving the tool tip around in 3D space, similar to that of a bike. We decided to use that same
design for locking and unlocking each side of the suturing device. The chain
will have two ends attached to the wires used to move the locking mechanisms.
The gear will only travel far enough to lock and unlock the suturing device. The
third and final mechanism, the push button, is designed similar to that of a
pen. It will be spring loaded, engaging and remaining engaged upon one push
followed by a permanent disengagement upon a second push. The button is attached
to a rod that will enter and exit two holes in the gear. The first hole will
represent the locked position of one side of the suturing tip and the unlocked
position of the other side. The second hole will represent exactly the opposite.
This design feature prevents the user from prematurely opening or closing either
side of the tool tip in order to prevent losing the needle inside the patient.

We have decided that the best material to
build our prototype out of will be ABS plastic because of its light weight and
we have prototyped this from the FDM machine. Many of our structural tests
revolved around the strength of this mate
rial. Several of the components for the
design are aluminum, so testing this material proved to be irrelevant since
the device will be used to perform very delicate procedures. The wires used are
.042 inches in diameter and are actually made for electric guitars. They are
wound with nickel plated steel and are built to handle about 14.8 lbs of tension
(which translates into 10.70 ksi) when in normal use in a guitar and are built
to withstand drastic changes (musicians bend strings) in tension and length (www.daddario.com).
They are heavy enough to achieve the push and pull we need.
There were several ways to go about testing the prototype to ensure that it was
built to withstand an actual endoscopic surgery. First off, we wanted to choose a
wire that is appropriate to the surgical procedure and can withstand the amount
of tension needed to open and close the suturing device. The amount of tension
needed to open and close the suturing device was measured using a force
meter. This helped us determine a maximum value for the necessary tensile of
strength of the wires. A similar procedure was completed for the chain to
ensure that it does not break under real time pressures. These parameters narrowed down our selection, and a tensile test
was performed on all of the
selected materials in order to prove their predicted tensile strength.
The suturing device is controlled by a mechanism that needs to
withstand the bending stresses imposed by the surgeon. For our prototype, the
chain needs to stay stiff to prevent sag. The channels holding the chain and
wires together in linear unison need to be strong enough to withstand the
device’s desire to sag during operation. On the other end, the actual suture
itself needs to be able to create enough pressure to pierce the flesh inside the
human body. We could not determine what this number will be, but the device can
be tested on ballistics gel, and an estimated amount of pressure can be measured
using a force sensor. Ballistics gel is the best known imitation of human skin,
so being able to cut through this material should prove the device strong enough
for any surgery, excluding cutting through bone. The sheath that protects the
suture was the toughest part to move. By measuring the force it
takes to combat the friction, we were able to have a good idea of the maximum parameters
for the project. In summary, both the suture, the hand controlled mechanism, and
the wires all have to be in tune to one another and strong enough to
collectively withstand the demands of endoscopic surgery.
In addition to the devices under bending and tensile stresses, part of our
concept has a feature that is under a certain amount of torque. This
part rotates the suturing device 180° to complete the suture. Similar to
those devices that move laterally, these rotating devices need to be
measured in accordance to their ability to withstand the conditions they are
routinely put through. Similar to what was mentioned above, the necessary
parameters were established based on the required strength of a particular
rotating part and the maximum torques were measured using a torque meter.

One other important detail includes using the right materials for any gears
that are being used. Past experiences have proved that plastic gears wear down
way to easily, but at the same time metal gears need to be accurate and require
a decent amount of lubrication. We have decided to go with nylon gears, for they
are the lightest of the materials we could choose from without compromising a
lot of strength.
|
Budget |
|
Travel:
Hershey to State College, 100 miles. First trip: $30, Second trip $40.
Materials:
ABS plastic for most of the control head. Weight will be approximately .3
lbs, which comes to about $63 for the housing and some other small parts.
The other parts will be metal wires, nylon gears, toggles, and star knobs,
which all totaled $60. Assume 2 prototypes, first and second.
Presentation:
Poster board, markers, glue, construction paper, pictures, copies should all
total less than $40.
Total Estimated Cost:
$311
|